It is a based of culture on corporation not competition with not just humans, but also everything that lives on the planet including other animals and resources. Through making profit a company can survive. So that the companies can operate in a sustainable and just way, which is also financially viable. Some people work hard toward the needs of others and the planet, while others will exploit. So that the companies can operate in a sustainable and just way, which is also financially viable. There have been cases reported abusive treatments in more than a quarter of its South Asian plants.

After several audits Nike reported that a large percentage of their overseas factories have their employees working in terrible environments for low pay and in unsanitary health conditions. Collapse in April of Rana building in Bangladesh, which housed a number of garment units, who were sub contractors to leading MNCs Multinational corporations collapsed, killing over a 1, people — mostly women and injuring seriously a few hundreds, keep happening. Hi, I am Sara from Studymoose Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? In the case of Nike, the company is not competing with the low end of the market, and one would assume that the premium pricing of the brand could allow for improvements in wages and working conditions. What is needed is a more open form of leadership that calls for collaboration among mutually parties in order to solve systemic problems. What does it mean to have an industry open-systems approach to social responsibility? So that the companies can operate in a sustainable and just way, which is also financially viable.


This will help Nike continue going forwards. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email. Whose responsibility is it to achieve that state?

case study nikes csr challenge

Page 1 of 5. Early this year in the state of Tamilnadu in India, 7 workers died when they were cleaning a tank in a textile dyeing unit, KPR textiles, Perundurai, Erode district. Who are the stakeholders?

What parties are involved? Company should protect the environment as well as making profit. What parties are involved? Leadership is another challenge that Nike is facing. So that the companies can operate in a sustainable and just way, which is cxse financially viable.

case study nikes csr challenge

Retrieved 12,from https: It makes a positive environment. Whose responsibility is it to achieve that state?

Real life example could be Gandhi, who has given hopes, whose life and personality was enhanced in the process. Discuss the meaning and implications of the statement by a Nike representative that “consumers are not rewarding us for investments in improved social performance in supply chains.

However ,at the same time ,company should take care of their staffs and employees,or they will fail to make the sutdy. Besidesa lot of staffs have to work for extra hours per week and wage level is lower than other industries.

In after reporting on its widespread challenbe treatment in factory plans Nike’s came back to report on its social and environmental practices.

Nike’s CSR challenge Essay

Instead the challenge is now to reform the way business is done. Your Answer is very helpful for Us Thank you a lot! Are you new to traveling?


How about receiving a customized one? The operation council of the Global Alliance after detailed audit, has commended Nike for the processes introduced, not only in its own operations and among its subcontractors, but also in the rest of the industry.

Leadership was traditionally seen as guiding employees towards the goal of the company. Nike start to create a positive environment and change system for upgrading. Stakeholders are person with an interest or concern in business.

Nike’s CSR challenge Essay Example for Free – Sample words

Apparently Challlenge is saying it wasn’t worth investing money into being more humane because at the end it did not resulted in more shoe sales. If so, there are some mistakes that you can make. It said that staffs and employees work in a poor environment. In addition ,environment is also very important.

This case talks about Csae challenges that Nike are facing. They are changing it from a closed system and making the company more open so that suppliers and customers can relate to Nike.

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website! Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. The open system involve labor ministries, civil society and competitors. The stakeholders are customers, suppliers, investors, and others relate to it.

Author: admin